PDA

View Full Version : Barack Obama is Racist


MarcusMaximus
03-18-2008, 11:45 PM
http://1918.com/images/xl/double_life_of_barack_obama.jpg

Barack Obama is Racist

SERMONGATE: WHAT DID HE KNOW . . . ?

From Philly.com: MIGHT Barack Obama have a Watergate problem?

Is his campaign headed for a tailspin not because of an underlying incident involving his pastor, but because of the way he responded to the maelstrom?

History is full of such mistakes. Richard Nixon wasn't forced to resign because of the Watergate break-in but because of the cover-up. The House impeached Bill Clinton for lying under oath, not for his sexual peccadillos. Larry Craig got jammed up not for his men's-room two-step, but for his ludicrous denial.

Since last week's YouTube eruption about the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama has been clear that he wasn't present for the fiery rhetoric that is everywhere in the media. If someone can show that he was indeed there, that could doom his candidacy.

For two decades, Barack and Michelle Obama have worshiped at the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, which has until recently been under the direction of the Rev. Wright. Theirs goes beyond the typical parishioner-preacher relationship.

Rev. Wright delivered Obama to Jesus, presided over Barack and Michelle's wedding, baptized their daughters and delivered a sermon that was the inspiration for Obama's second book.

And until last week, the reverend served on an Obama campaign committee.

Wright's brand of fire and brimstone has the candidate scrambling.

He used words like:

"We bombed Hiroshima. We bombed Nagasaki. And we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye. We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans and now we are indignant, because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back into our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost!"

Video of the Rev. Wright in a television report by ABC's Brian Ross catapulted this controversy from talk radio into the mainstream media. By Friday night, Sen. Obama had no choice but to address it.

Keith Olbermann on MSNBC and Major Garrett on Fox News interviewed him. In both, Obama said he'd never been present for the type of sermon that has made his preacher big news.

Sen. Obama then blogged at HuffingtonPost.com: "The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation."

Fair enough.

It would be wrong to hold Barack Obama the churchgoer accountable for the words of a preacher spoken outside of his presence.

But look out if in the face of these blanket denials someone can show otherwise. In the Internet/YouTube age in which we live, no doubt individuals are already combing the data.

"Dreams from My Father," the senator's first book, was written when he was 33, far before his presidential campaign. It offers a terrific, unmuzzled glimpse into the thinking of a younger Barack Obama.

On page 291, Obama describes a sermon delivered by the Rev. Wright called "The Audacity to Hope" (itself the inspiration of his second book and its now-famous title, "The Audacity of Hope") during which Wright recounted the sermon of a fellow pastor who described a painting he had once seen titled "Hope."

The painting depicts a harpist, Obama recalls the Rev. Wright explaining, who sits "bruised and bloodied" atop a mountain. Chaos in the form of famine, war and deprivation reign in the valley below, Wright says.

Obama quotes Rev. Wright: " 'It is a world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks' greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere . . . That's the world! On which hope sits.' "

Obama continues: "And so it went, a meditation on a fallen world. While the boys next to me doodled on their church bulletin, Rev. Wright spoke of Sharpsville and Hiroshima, the callousness of policy makers in the White House and in the State House. As the sermon unfolded, though, the stories of strife became more prosaic, the pain more immediate."

Rest assured Obama's recollection of that sermon is getting a closer reading.

". . . white folks' greed runs a world in need . . ."

". . . Rev. Wright spoke of Sharpsville and Hiroshima, the callousness of policy makers in the White House and in the State House."

Are those references when Obama was in the pew similar to those that have caused Obama to distance himself from Wright?

No. He was describing the woman in the painting as looking as if she'd been in Hiroshima: bleeding, bandaged and with tattered clothing, and yet she had hope. Re-recordings of this sermon by Wright are circulated online and reflect a very measured, thoughtful presentation.

Too bad Rev. Wright's references to Hiroshima didn't end there.

This whole topic is - no doubt - to be continued . . . *

MarcusMaximus
03-18-2008, 11:47 PM
From NRO: There is something both poignant and galling about the candidacy of Barack Obama.

Any American, regardless of party or race, has to find it heartening that the country has reached the point where a black candidate for president of the United States sweeps so many primaries in states where the overwhelming majority of the population is white.

We have all seen the crowds enthralled by Barack Obama’s rhetoric and theatrical style.

Many of his supporters put their money where their mouths were, so that this recently arrived senator received more millions of dollars in donations than candidates who have been far more visible on the national stage for far more years.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that Barack Obama has been leading as much of a double life as Eliot Spitzer.

While talking about bringing us together and deploring “divisive” actions, Senator Obama has for 20 years been a member of a church whose minister, Jeremiah Wright, has said that “God Bless America” should be replaced by “God damn America” — among many other wild and even obscene denunciations of American society, including blanket racist attacks on whites.

Nor was this an isolated example. Fox News Channel has played tapes of various sermons of Jeremiah Wright, and says that it has tapes with hours more of the same.

Wright’s actions matched his words. He went with Louis Farrakhan to Libya and Farrakhan received an award from his church.

Sean Hannity began reporting on Jeremiah Wright back in April of 2007. But the mainstream media saw no evil, heard no evil, and spoke no evil.

Now that the facts have come out in a number of places, and can no longer be suppressed, many in the media are trying to spin these facts out of existence.

Spin number one is that Jeremiah Wright’s words were “taken out of context.” Like most people who use this escape hatch, those who say this do not explain what the words mean when taken in context.

In just what context does “God damn America” mean something different?

Spin number two is that Barack Obama says he didn’t hear the particular things that Jeremiah Wright said that are now causing so much comment.

It wasn’t just an isolated remark. Nor were the enthusiastic responses of the churchgoers something which suggests that this anti-American attitude was news to them or something that they didn’t agree with.

If Barack Obama was not in church that particular day, he belonged to that church for 20 years. He made a donation of more than $20,000 to that church.

In all that time, he never had a clue as to what kind of man Jeremiah Wright was? Give me a break!

You can’t be with someone for 20 years, call him your mentor, and not know about his racist and anti-American views.

Neither Barack Obama nor his media spinmeisters can put this story behind him with some facile election-year rhetoric. If Senator Obama wants to run with the rabbits and hunt with the hounds, then at least let the rabbits and the hounds know that.

The fact that Obama talks differently than Jeremiah Wright does not mean that his track record is different. Barack Obama’s voting record in the Senate is perfectly consistent with the far-left ideology and the grievance culture, just as his wife’s statement that she was never proud of her country before is consistent with that ideology.

Senator Barack Obama’s political success thus far has been a blow for equality. But equality has its down side.

Equality means that a black demagogue who has been exposed as a phony deserves exactly the same treatment as a white demagogue who has been exposed as a phony.

We don’t need a president of the United States who got to the White House by talking one way, voting a very different way in the Senate, and who for 20 years followed a man whose words and deeds contradict Obama’s carefully crafted election-year image.

LucysMusicBox
04-02-2008, 06:04 PM
interesting stuff there. was going to vote for hillary anyways :0

bizzybody
04-02-2008, 10:25 PM
Nobody ever said a word to Obama about Wright's sermon the Sunday after 9/11. Riiiiight. Pull the other one, it's got a dead skunk on.

People who go to church ALWAYS talk about sermons from prior weeks, especially to people who missed them.